ISI MMath Solutions and Discussion 2019 : PMB
ISI MMath PMB 2019 Subjective Questions along with hints and solutions and discussions
To view ISI MMATH 2020 solutions, hints, and discussions: Click Here
To view ISI MMATH 2018 solutions, hints, and discussions: Click Here
To view ISI MMATH 2017 solutions, hints, and discussions: Click Here
To view ISI MMATH 2016 solutions, hints, and discussions: Click Here
To view previous year’s question papers: Click Here
Problem 1.
Let be a continuous function satisfying
Show that is a bounded function on
and attains a maximum or a minimum. Give an example to show that it attains a maximum but not a minimum.
Topic: Real Analysis
Difficulty level: Medium
Indian Statistical Institute, ISI MMath 2019 Problem 1 Hints along with Solution & Discussion
Hint 1
Assume that is non-negative, i.e.
for all
If
for all
then obviously
is bounded and attains its maximal (and minimal) value at each point. Let
for some
By assumption, there exists
such that for all
and all
Let
be the restriction of
to
is a continuous function on a compact segment.
Hint 2
Let be a continuous function satisfying
The function is a non-negative continuous function satisfying
Hint 3
For the Example part, consider the function
Full Solution
Step 1:
Assume that is non-negative, i.e.
for all
If
for all
then obviously
is bounded and attains its maximal (and minimal) value at each point. Let
for some
By assumption, there exists
such that for all
and all
Let
be the restriction of
to
is a continuous function on a compact segment. Hence,
is bounded and attains its maximal value on
i.e. there exists
such that
We check that the function
attains its maximal value at
Let
Then
Let or
Then
and
So, for each
is bounded and attains its maximal value.
Step 2:
Let be a continuous function satisfying
The function is a non-negative continuous function satisfying
By step 1, is bounded and attains its maximal value. It means that there exists
such that for all
So, for all
The function is bounded. If
then
and
attains its maximal value. If
then
and
attains its minimal value.
Step 3:
Consider the function Then
is a continuous non-negative function,
In particular, Further,
Function attains its maximal value at
However, for all
and the function
does not attain its minimal value.
Problem 2.
Let be a continuous function such that
Show
that
Topic: Real Analysis
Difficulty Level: Easy
Indian Statistical Institute, ISI MMath 2019 Problem 2 Hints along with Solution & Discussion
Hint 1
Function is bounded, as it is a continuous function on a compact
Let
Fix
By assumption, there exists
such that for all
Let
be such that
Hint 2
Let and
If
then
Hint 3
If then
Full Solution
Function is bounded, as it is a continuous function on a compact
Let
Fix
By assumption, there exists
such that for all
Let
be such that
Let and
If
then
If then
In any case,
and
Since is arbitrary, this proves the needed convergence.
Problem 3.
Let be a twice continuously differentiable function and
suppose If
for all
then prove that
for all
Topic: Real Analysis
Difficulty Level: Medium
Indian Statistical Institute, ISI MMath 2019 Problem 3 Hints along with Solution & Discussion
Hint 1
For every we have by the Newton-Leibniz formula
Hint 2
Applying the Newton-Leibniz rule again we get
Hint 3
In particular, for each we have
Full Solution
For every we have by the Newton-Leibniz formula
Applying the Newton-Leibniz rule again we get
In particular, for each we have
Problem 4.
Suppose is a function defined by
(a). Find all such that
has a nonzero directional derivative at
with respect to the direction
(b). Is continuous at
Justify your answer.
Topic: Multivariable Calculus
Difficulty Level: Medium
Indian Statistical Institute, ISI MMath 2019 Problem 4 Hints along with Solution & Discussion
Hint 1
Part a.
Let
Then the directional derivative at
with respect to the direction
is
Hint 2
Let Then the directional derivative at
with respect to the direction
is
Hint 3
Part b.
If is continuous at
, then for any sequence
we have
Let
Full Solution
Part a.
Let
Then the directional derivative at
with respect to the direction
is
Let Then the directional derivative at
with respect to the direction
is
has a nonzero directional derivative at
with respect to the direction
if and only if
and
Part b.
If is continuous at
, then for any sequence
we have
Let
Then
So, is not continuous at
Problem 5.
Let be a subset of a compact metric space
Assume that for
every continuous function , the restriction of
to
attains
a maximum on Prove that
is compact.
Topic: Metric Space
Difficulty Level: Medium
Indian Statistical Institute, ISI MMath 2019 Problem 5 Hints along with Solution & Discussion
Hint 1
A subset of a compact metric space is compact if and only if it is a closed subset. So, it is enough to check that is a closed subset of
Hint 2
Let Consider function
is a continuous function on
Hint 3
Indeed, by the triangle inequality,
So, attains a maximum on
. Since
it follows that there exists a point
such that
Full Solution
A subset of a compact metric space is compact if and only if it is a closed subset. So, it is enough to check that is a closed subset of
Let
Consider function
is a continuous function on
Indeed, by the triangle inequality,
So, attains a maximum on
. Since
it follows that there exists a point
such that
Then
and
So,
and
is closed.
Problem 6.
Let be a non-abelian group of order
, where
are primes.
(a). How many elements of have order
(b). How many elements of have order
Topic: Group Theory
Difficulty Level: Medium
Indian Statistical Institute, ISI MMath 2019 Problem 6 Hints along with Solution & Discussion
Hint 1
The order of an element divides the order of a group. So each element of is of order
or
Since
is non-abelian, it has no elements of order
By Cauchy’s theorem, there exists an element
of order
Then each of the elements
is of order .
Hint 2
Assume that is of order
and
Consider subgroups
and
Hint 3
Then is a subgroup of
strictly smaller than
(as
). The order of
is prime, hence
Consider cosets
The size of each coset is and there are
cosets.
hence two of different cosets intersect:
Full Solution
The order of an element divides the order of a group. So each element of is of order
or
Since
is non-abelian, it has no elements of order
By Cauchy’s theorem, there exists an element
of order
Then each of the elements
is of order .
Assume that is of order
and
Consider subgroups
and
Then is a subgroup of
strictly smaller than
(as
). The order of
is prime, hence
Consider cosets
The size of each coset is and there are
cosets.
hence two of different cosets intersect:
We deduce that there exists such that
But then
which contradicts the fact that
is of order
Conclusion: all elements of order are among
(a). There are elements of order
(b). There are elements of order
Problem 7.
Prove or disprove the following statement: The ring is isomorphic to a product of fields.
Topic: Field Theory
Difficulty Level: Hard
Indian Statistical Institute, ISI MMath 2019 Problem 7 Hints along with Solution & Discussion
Hint 1
We prove that is isomorphic to a product of three fields. Consider the factorization
Hint 2
Consider ideals
Hint 3
Relations
imply that ideals are pairwise coprime.
Now try to apply the Chinese remainder theorem.
Full Solution
We prove that is isomorphic to a product of three fields. Consider the factorization
Consider ideals
Relations
imply that ideals are pairwise coprime. By the Chinese remainder theorem,
Each of the multiples in the right-hand side is a field, as it is a quotient of by an irreducible polynomial. In fact,
The ring is isomorphic to a product of three fields
Problem 8.
Let be a symmetric matrix with real entries such that
for some
Show that
Topic: Linear Algebra
Difficulty Level: Medium
Indian Statistical Institute, ISI MMath 2019 Problem 8 Hints along with Solution & Discussion
Hint 1
A symmetric real matrix is diagonalizable
Hint 2
there exists an invertible matrix and a diagonal matrix
such that
Hint 3
Then
Full Solution
A symmetric real matrix is diagonalizable: there exists an invertible matrix and a diagonal matrix
such that
Then
So,
and
and
Problem 9.
Suppose and
are two
matrices with real entries such that
the sum of their ranks is strictly less than Show that there exists a
nonzero column vector such that
Topic: Linear Algebra
Difficulty Level: Easy
Indian Statistical Institute, ISI MMath 2019 Problem 9 Hints along with Solution & Discussion
Hint 1
Consider the matrix
The rank of is the maximal number of linearly independent rows of
Hint 2
Then
Hint 3
Consequently, columns of are linearly dependent, and there exists a nonzero vector
such that
It means that
Full Solution
Consider the matrix
The rank of is the maximal number of linearly independent rows of
Then
Consequently, columns of are linearly dependent, and there exists a nonzero vector
such that
It means that
Problem 10.
Suppose there are persons in a party. Every pair of persons meet each other with probability
independently of the other pairs.
Let be the number of people the
person meets in the party. For all
with
and for all
show that
Topic: Probability
Difficulty Level: Medium
Indian Statistical Institute, ISI MMath 2019 Problem 10 Hints along with Solution & Discussion
Hint 1
Introduce two events:
Assume the event happens. Then
meets
and
meets
other persons (from
possible persons). There are
choices of persons except
that
meets. The probability that
meets
persons except
is
Hint 2
Further, meets
persons except
(from
possible persons). There are
choices of persons except
that
meets. The probability that
meets
persons except
is
Hint 3
Finally,
Full Solution
Introduce two events:
Assume the event happens. Then
meets
and
meets
other persons (from
possible persons). There are
choices of persons except
that
meets. The probability that
meets
persons except
is
Further, meets
persons except
(from
possible persons). There are
choices of persons except
that
meets. The probability that
meets
persons except
is
Finally,
Assume the event happens. Then
does not meet
and
meets
other persons (from
possible persons). There are
choices of persons except
that
meets. The probability that
meets
persons except
is
Further, meets
persons except
(from
possible persons). There are
choices of persons except
that
meets. The probability that
meets
persons except
is
Finally,
We deduce that
I have tried my best to explain the solutions. If you have some other solutions, please feel free to add them in the comment section. My website is latex enabled so that you can type all the mathematical equations. If you face any problem understanding the solutions, then comment here, and I will get back to you as soon as I can. Also if you find any mathematical error or any typing error then please do comment here.
Sir,
I am from howrah, West Bengal. There is a kind request to you from my side that if u please teach me as a private tutor for preparation for ISI and CMI, I would be highly obliged. I also like your problems and try to figure it out. But I think it would be more clear if you kind see to my above request.
Regards,
Soumyajit Ganguly
Please check your email. I have sent you all the details regarding our classes.
Sir
I am from howrah, West Bengal. There is a kind request to you from my side that if u please teach me as a private tutor for preparation for ISI and CMI, I would be highly obliged. I also like your problems and try to figure it out. But I think it would be more clear if you kind see to my above request.
Please check your email. I have sent you all the details regarding our classes.
Hi!
Can you please conduct few mock tests for ISI M.MATH entrance?
We will try our best to make the mock test course. But currently, we are busy with making some other courses. We will keep you updated.
Sir, it would be really very helpful if you can create a mock test course for this year’s entrance.
In 5th question I got it h(x)<h(x○)=1 but I didn't got how u proved then that C is closed
Showing that C(Bar)=C, that is C contains all it’s limit points. The last line there would be C(bar) but the latex is not taking the symbol bar.
For problem 3, can we use the Taylor’s theorem instead? like for f(x)= f(0) + xf'(0) + (x^2/2)f”(c), for c belongs to (0,x) where for x<0 the case is same because in either way f'(0) = 0 = f(0)
so when we apply |f(x)| =|x^2f"(c)|/2 < 1/2
For problem 3, can we use the Taylor’s theorem instead? like for
, for
and for
, the case is same because in either way data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42693/4269329882174777e14dd4b8d1eb527a69d2cf43" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com f'(0) = 0 = f(0)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f92b2/f92b286cd97ff3ba79c644f715db09f2e07dff61" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com |f(x)| = \dfrac{|x^2 f"(c)|}{2} \leq \dfrac{1}{2}"
so when we apply
For problem 3, can we use the Taylor’s theorem instead? like for
, for
and for
, the case is same because in either way data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42693/4269329882174777e14dd4b8d1eb527a69d2cf43" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com f'(0) = 0 = f(0)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f92b2/f92b286cd97ff3ba79c644f715db09f2e07dff61" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com |f(x)| = \dfrac{|x^2 f"(c)|}{2} \leq \dfrac{1}{2}"
so when we apply
#1) similar sol. for question 3rd:
i.e. Maclaurin’s theorem can we used.
#2) and i think for question no. 10th: probability section i.e. in case of P[B] , there is a calculation mistake …
if not then i have doubt how { (1-p)^ 2n – k – l – 3 } comes?
because i concluded it is not -3 , it would be -4.
please correct me.
#3) for question no. 4th:
can we check limit along the curve y = x^2/3 which can also shows that f is not continuous?
#4) for |G| = pq
if we take a example of o(G) = 10 = 1*2*5
let p=2 < q=5 and both are prime.
and there is an element of order 1 (identity element) and it is non abelian group i.e. no element exist of order 10.
now phi(q) == phi(5) == (5^1-5^0) == 4
that is we can say only four elements are there of order q. And remaining elements could be of order p i.e. there are 4 elements of
order q.
Also q=5 implies that no. of elements of order q = q -1
And no. of elements of order p == o(G) – identity element – (q-1) == (p-1)q
can it be possible ?
if not give the query please.
sorry for #2)
it was my mistake.
For the 6th problem, It easily follows from the Sylow’s theorem.
for some
and
i.e there exist a unique subgroup of order
. so there are
elements of order data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/032d4/032d41d5e4d95fb1898c749f11d1bf69bccdcf3a" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com q"
has order either
or
. So the remaining elements must have order data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34a48/34a483d6b194c97e9e803312a32e29af15b20181" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com p"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ccc6/4ccc6c219d5b4f53650a23570d9e9f6fb428ae2a" alt="Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com pq-1 - (q-1) = q(p-1)"
No. of q-sylow subgroup is,
and we know that every non-identity element in
Therefore the no. of elements having order q is
Sir,I am from Midnapore college ,W.B and I have decided to appear in ISI.math entrance.But I have no guide.So,I am quite confused about what type of preparation and study is needed.Please suggest me something in this regard.
I have already written everything you need to know on how to prepare for the ISI M.Math entrance exam here: https://fractionshub.com/courses/i-s-i-m-math-i-i-t-jam-exam-preparation/
Hello SIr, I am preparing for ISI MMath Entrance. Can you please provide my some training for problem solving. Is there any mock test series for ISI MMath
You will have to join the MMath group here. I teach for MMath entrance exam. No there is no mock tests for ISI MMath.
Great work…
Can you provide your what’s app group?
You can text me on WhatsApp @ 9700803692.
For problem 9, Here’s an alternative solution:
then we are done. Otherwise assume that
, also note that
then
. So we have
as dim(Ker (A) \cap ker(B)) =0 but from the given condition we have
we have
i.e
but from the above inequality we get a contradiction. Hence
. Therefore the result follows
if
For problem 9, Here’s an alternative solution:
then we are done. Otherwise assume that
, also note that
then
. So we have
as
but from the given condition we have
we have
i.e
but from the above inequality we get a contradiction. Hence
. Therefore the result follows
if
Sir ,your solution is really very helpful..
But if you provide us crash course for preparing M math ..
It will be very helpful…
For problem 2 can we use sandwich theorem instead,
Since g : [0,1] –> R, it is a continuous function from a compact set, thus its image will be compact.
|g(x)| 0
Let k be the supremum
for x belongs to [0,1)
-M(x^n) <= (x^n) g(x) <= k <= M (x^n)
applying limit and sandwich theorem, we get k tends to 0, and for x=1 since g(1)=0, thus (1^n)(g(1))=0, thus the limit always tends to zero.